Against Slavery Of Any And All People


I am sure that this is what America stands for. What standard of civility will it fall to? Our own troops firing upon us? All citizens serve the Federal government? That is totally against what the Constitution is about.  In abolishing slavery, our country took the steps necessary to insure that the people would not be used by anyone as forced labor. 

The 'new order' which the world corporations would have us accept will destroy our Constitution. They have already started to erode our rights, with hidden agendas that support Constitutional amendments in their favor, and to the people's detriment.

What is upon us is as intimidating as slavery. We the people must now protect our Constitution from the very government that is supposed to defend and uphold it. The 'end times' of the American Constitution are near, and we must do something now. 




"It may safely be received as an axiom in our political system,

that the State governments will, in all possible contingencies,

afford complete security

against invasions of the public liberty by the national authority."  

-Alexander Hamilton

Article Six's meaning is slowly being changed in common language outside of the Constitutional wording, whic is:

“ All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States. ”


But Wikipedia now contains an article written in "'commons language" that changes and adds to it enough jargon for it to be construed as giving undo power to the Federal government. Here is what it says:

"Article Six establishes the Constitution, and the laws and treaties of the United States made according to it, to be the supreme law of the land, and that "the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, any thing in the laws or constitutions of any state notwithstanding." It also validates national debt created under the Articles of Confederation and requires that all federal and state legislators, officers, and judges take oaths or affirmations to support the Constitution. This means that the states' constitutions and laws should not conflict with the laws of the federal constitution and that in case of a conflict, state judges are legally bound to honor the federal laws and constitution over those of any state."

It seems that this is how history and the Constitution and it's meaning will be changed, and formed, to meet the needs of the hijacked Federal government and it's corporate bedfellows. We must act soon before the original meaning of the Constitution and its Articles are changed forever by the 1984 style of history that pretends to be the real thing. If you haven't seen the movie 1984, AND read the book, NOW IS THE TIME.

The majority has become a paid institutionalized money pot. If the majority can be bought, it is not the majority anymore. We can not allow 'majority rules' in this country. This is a republic. We, the people, are not being represented.

I would like to point you to an interesting article about our states' powers, an example set by Pennsylvania a long time ago. I will add an excerpt from the end of the article.

From the article Early Pennsylvania, Nullifying the Way to Freedom

 by Steve Palmer

found at


"Natural Rights

Before wrapping up, I would also like to redirect slightly for a final point about natural rights. Some of today's writers seem to think that our rights are granted and revoked at the whim of the government. Examining the question of slavery makes the error in that viewpoint clear. Was slavery reprehensible because of the thirteenth amendment or was slavery reprehensible because men's inherent rights to Liberty were being violated?

Those who say that our rights come to us at the pleasure of government must also believe that if a majority votes to repeal the thirteenth amendment, than slavery could be sanctioned. This is self-evidently wrong to anyone with a functioning conscience. It is clear from this example that our rights are natural possessions which cannot be granted or withdrawn by government edict."

LeisaWolf LeisaWolf
51-55, F
1 Response Feb 23, 2010

While doing research on the Constitution a little while back, I noticed that most of the online copies of the document are "rewritten for your convenience". As if our modern minds can't comprehend the archaic speech of the writers of the document. Finding these "rewritten Constitutions" made me wonder what would happen if the original Constitution was lost or stolen. What proof would we, as Americans, have that the people have been "endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights". Everyone should print out a copy and stash it the closet, you never know what will happen...