Say it again. There is no conflict ever that could not have been resolved with diplomacy. Peaceful resolutions should always be sought, but this is not on the agenda of most governments.
Hmm...War is needed in an imprefect world. To paraphrase General Washington the best way for peace is to be prepared for war. Some wars are a necessary evil, American Revolutionary War, American Civil War, along with World War II however some war is not needed and done by those men whose eyes are turned into dollar signs. But to make a blanket statement that diplomacy is the only answer is wrong. Remember the purpose of the military is to enforce national policy when diplomacy fails.
Obviously some of you need to read your history and talk with the people who have actually been to war. War is not a very attractive alternative but neither is enslavement.
Diplomacy is ONLY effective because it is backed up by the threat of war. Peaceful resolutions are not always acceptable. How would you peacefully resolve Hitler seizing portions of Eastern Europe + refusing to return it?
It's not because it's backed up with the use of force. The reason Hitler got so far in the first place was through the appeasement of the early days and lack of tough diplomacy. After that failure, there was little alternative, but it was a collective failure.
They are necessary, but only because it is an imperfect world. Any armed conflict should only be used as a very last resort. Routinely, spurious arguments about 'regime change' and the 'war on terror' has been used to invade. It is the 10th anniversary today of the 'Stop The War' marches in ondon and elsewhere and still war criminals George W Bush and Tony Blair walk free.
Looking at my post, I have no idea where 'ondon' is, hehe (my spelling is very good, but my typing is crap). They are war criminals every bit as much as BIn Laden et al, cut from the same fevered cloth.
Unfortunately war is convenient for governments. With the alibi of a a foreign enemy they keep the population brainwashed and unaware of the way they are being robbed and exploited by their own politicians. Besides, it means great surpluses for weapon industries, which are the greatest funding proveyors in political campaigns.
He doesn't give a damn about common people. I remember Paul Weller discussing about Cameron's supposed love of 'Eton Rifles', saying 'What part of the song doesn't he f****** understand?' (similarly with The Smiths). Morally bankrupt.