were could society be headingmany people today truly believe that being homosexual is unnatural, that it is a choice. I have come to accept that homosexuals did not choose to be attracted to the same sex. of course we know that its becoming more accepted these days because they are both consenting adults, and that they should do what they will.
so therefore, homosexuality is accepted because:
1. the people are born attracted to the same sex
2. the people who commit the act are both consenting
so lets take on societies argument of beastliness. Many people who like animals do not choose to like animals, they are also born having sexual attractions to animals, similar to the way a man is born attracted to women, or the way he can be born attracted to men. of course many gay-rights activists would agree on the matter of ********** saying that an animal isn't smart enough to consent so it'll be considered rape.
but let me give you a hypothetical. say if a woman openly consents to bending over, and then after which a dog (on its own) jumps on top of her and has sex with her. I know this is disgusting but it does happen! I've seen things on the internet my eyes cant take back. in this scenario both the dog and the women are consenting to the act.
so hypothetically if society were to accept homosexuality as something that's moral on the grounds that they are:
1. Born with the attraction and
then doesn't that also mean in the scenario when an animal and a human consent to sex will then also be accepted on the very same grounds? as shown in the example given above.
think about it. id love to hear you're opinion on this. please do not thinking I'm doing this out of hate, instead please explain how you would respond to this accusation as I am very open minded and I will switch sides if some one can explain why homosexuality and beastliness would be different in the scenarios i have provided.
shadman92 18-21, M 2 Responses 1 Feb 6, 2013