Register

I Supported John Mccain For President

Not Just President

By: gwenwood
Written on May 30th, 2008
By: gwenwood
Age: 46-50
3,542 people have read this story

Your Response

By clicking "Post", you confirm that you agree to the Terms of Service of Experience Project, Inc.
12 responses
  • 0
    NEW!
    Spotlight outstanding comments to help more people see them, and to show your appreciation to the author.
    kaioak36

    You're pathetic! Hillary Clinton has been an exceptional Secretary of State and President Obama has done a great job considering what he inherited from the last RepubliCON!

    Aug 14, 2012
    1 like
  • 0
    NEW!
    Spotlight outstanding comments to help more people see them, and to show your appreciation to the author.
    Jemue

    "The highest ranking military person in the world" ............ just jingoistic arrogance ...... and people wonder why the US and it's people has the reputation it does .........



    I suggest you try reading.

    Jan 21, 2011
    2 likes
  • 0
    NEW!
    Spotlight outstanding comments to help more people see them, and to show your appreciation to the author.
    gigilarkin

    Thank god that Obama was elected! Do you actually believe it would have been better if McCain was president. He put the country in the worst peril ever (military included) by choosing that idiot Sarah Pallen as a running mate! So that was a result of his decision making ability -- really -- OR were his strings just being pulled by the Grand Ol' Party????



    By the way, did I interpret your post correctly that you were a WAC during Nam? If so, you must have been the youngest person in history since you list your age as 46-50.

    Jan 18, 2011
    1 like
  • 0
    NEW!
    Spotlight outstanding comments to help more people see them, and to show your appreciation to the author.
    User3rror

    Ron Paul would've made an excellent president.

    Dec 16, 2009
    2 likes
  • 0
    NEW!
    Spotlight outstanding comments to help more people see them, and to show your appreciation to the author.
    kaylen123

    OBAMA OBAMA OBAMA OBAMA OBAMA all the way :]





    -but I totally respect your opinion.

    Oct 13, 2009
    1 like
  • 0
    NEW!
    Spotlight outstanding comments to help more people see them, and to show your appreciation to the author.
    Jacob1080David

    Would seem your for the war in Iraq. Hmm...we need to prevent saddam's weapons of mass destruction right? o no, now we need to spread democracy and freedom to Iraq. Well if the Iraqi citizens under a tyrannical regieme of saddam hussein, (who was put in power by our cia) then why aren't the people of Darfur deserving of the same? The Iraqi citizens weren't particularly suffering, least not compared to the standards of living of those around. And if they were, well it's our fault for putting saddam in power in the first place. We put him in because he would remain loyal to us and our interests, aka give us oil, in exchange he got money and built an infastructure for the country, something that the country greatly benefited for. Then he goes and tests some biological weapons on northern Iraq who was rebelling, and creates a long war against Iran, and invades kuwait. Not the best things, but again, we put him there, were to blame, so ok, let's go in there and take him out. Now what, saddam's son isn't going around the streets raping women he chooses in his limo. YAY! now our us soldiers are doing the same in humvees. The difference? about 100K Iraqi's dead. And now Iran is without it's buffer, the two kept each other in check, like two crabs in a bucket each constantly struggling to get on top of the other, but neither actually getting out. But now that Iran doesn't have to spend focus on military power vs Iraq, it can spend on creating their bomb to wipe israel. No we didn't go into Iraq to free them, we went there to steal their oil. (My own personal opinion of the plan is that Iraq is now a military base to suppress any rebellion to of the new world order to come. It's WWIII's early stages. Russia is attempting to grab back it's previous territories, Europe is uniting. Every major power is drooling at grabbing up territory when war busts out. Also, in my opinion, this leaves Iran free to build a nuke to take out israel. You saw their last elections stolen, the people didn't vote in their dictator, why should't we give them freedom too? Cause the bible says all nations will abandon israel and gather at it's doorstep to conqueror it. US will fail in keeping Iran in check, fulfilling that we will abandon it, and Israel will pay the price. Least those are some of my long term predictions, of yes, worst case scenarios, but the mayan calendar has to run out sometime right?) Anyways, sorry I rant, but the simple fact that somebody supports another puppet of the NWO brings out my rant.

    Oct 11, 2009
    1 like
  • 0
    NEW!
    Spotlight outstanding comments to help more people see them, and to show your appreciation to the author.
    myspip

    It was bad timing for McCain, or almost any other republican for that matter, in the past election. What the world needed (not just US) was a pro-Keynesian to help restore the economy. And of the two, Obama was by far more suitable for the job.



    You should perhaps read into regular economics (not become a supply-side freaker, or monetarist *spits*), and become slightly more tolerant of the 'terrorists': Most of them are poor souls who were brainwashed by crazy fundamentalist brains - the latter being the only true bad guys. (An analogy: Soldiers fighting against eachother are usually not personal enemies - they do what they are told, paid for, or conditioned to do - they should not be blamed for killing other side's soldiers in a war).



    And if Obama is not 'the best' at warfare and strategy, he has got advisers; any intelligent being who knows of his weakness will also consult others, who are more qualified. And about the negotiating: No one will singlehandedly ever make people forget the past (I'm thinking about the hate towards Israel in those areas: Read some world history and you'll understand their problems) - what can be done is to improve the situation; war, by experience, has not done so in those areas (in e.g. Japan etc (Japanese aggression towards Asia), it has helped a lot), so logically, there is nothing wrong with trying other things than war.



    (Another analogy: You feel so strongly towards the American soldiers - that's just normal: But those you are accusing of terrorism/aggression - they feel the same, and for a MUCH MUCH longer period of time. If you don't think you may change suddenly in, do you think they will too?? No, but their children and childrens children may, if they never experience what people do, and have done in the past).

    Aug 13, 2009
    2 likes
  • 0
    NEW!
    Spotlight outstanding comments to help more people see them, and to show your appreciation to the author.
    yeswecan90

    i respect your choice, i just think McCain is a bit stubborn!

    Feb 17, 2009
    1 like
  • 0
    NEW!
    Spotlight outstanding comments to help more people see them, and to show your appreciation to the author.
    winstonwelles

    Does the commander in chief actually have anything more than a ceremonial role in the US then? In the UK the CiC is the Queen, and she's not exactly a hard-bitten military commander last I checked.

    Jan 13, 2009
    1 like
  • 0
    NEW!
    Spotlight outstanding comments to help more people see them, and to show your appreciation to the author.
    eldejota

    I invite everybody in this conversation to inspire others to vote. Go to this site: http://www.amillionreasonstovote.com and share one of your million reasons to vote.

    Oct 3, 2008
    1 like
  • 0
    NEW!
    Spotlight outstanding comments to help more people see them, and to show your appreciation to the author.
    gunman380

    war is only pointless if you quit without victory!!

    Jul 10, 2008
    1 like
  • 0
    NEW!
    Spotlight outstanding comments to help more people see them, and to show your appreciation to the author.
    chrismccarthy

    Obama did not vote for the war. He was not even in the Senate at the time.



    And exactly what great catastrophe did the US suffer because we left Vietnam? I guess Communism took over the world, right? Your war was pointless, your son's and your nephew's wars are pointless. Live with it.

    Jun 26, 2008
    4 likes