Post

How Should Teenage Girls Get Spanked?

Hey all,

I am a teen girl, 15 years old and I still get spanked a lot. My parents feel it's the best for me. I get spanked bare mostly, but when I'm lucky I can keep my pants on. I am writing a paper about corporal punishment and different opinions. So I'd like to know how teenage girls (12-18 years old) need to get spanked.

Do you think teenage girls need them, and so, how should it be done? I am asking for a place where it has to happen, which implements, how long, should there be any cornertime? Or do you think teenage girls shouldn't get spanked? If so, which punishments are good then?

I'd like to hear your opinions, and I may use them in my paper. I don't use any names, so be honest and clear please :)

xx
JC97 JC97 18-21, F 26 Responses Apr 20, 2013

Your Response

Cancel

I get spanked with a belt and its jeans and panties down for me, I hate it it hurts and plus my dad just bought a paddle today and tomorrow I'm gonna be the first he uses it on

Best be good, then ;-). A serious question - where does a Dad go to but a paddle?

Up on all fours on the bed, pants and panties off, with the belt, as long as is required.

I always spanked my daughter over my knee and only used my hand. I let her keep her panties on util she was across my lap and then pulled them down when I started to spank her... after the spanking, I would pull them up before she stood. That way, she did could preserve a little modesty.

nothing wrong spanking your nude teen daughters *** if and when she deserves it and even just for fun sometimes

if parents want real control over their teen daughters they should make them go nude around the house at all times, some parents don't think of that and some think it to lewd but if you think about it its the right thing

Pants and panties down, as you lay on the bed his hand smacks your azz cheeks. As your legs slowly spread, the hand begins smacking your very tender vagina until you climax. The other choice is to have your wrists tied above your head. A wet towel will be used to pop you on your butt and back. If you continue to be disobedient then as you hang by your wrists, the towel will be used to pop you on your belly first, breasts second then finally between your legs.

a firm hand is needed - the older, the more the lesson needs to be made. 15 and up, usually completely bare, and I use a belt.

in my teen years my mother would give me a whipping with a belt. got my last
One at about 18. Was still effective as it was at 12.

I find that punishments hurt a bit less as I got older, but they still hurt, even now!

the jeans came down as i got older to keep it effective. Wow that was a completely new level of punishment, the first time i got a whipping on my panties. Ouch

I'm spanked bare but message me would love to chat

O think it's wrong. Parents should be allowed to smack a small child but the premeditated spanking of older children is not necessary and teaches them that hurting others is OK.

I think spankings do work, even if I don't like getting spanked. I sure don't feel like breaking rules after a hard spanking. As long as parents don't go overboard, then its fine.

i am a father of 4 kids 2 of each i spanked then all and up till they was 16 i would be happy to reply to any questions you have

Spankings are good for your age you go through a lot of changes and I would say spanked in jeans or shorts by hand about 20 swats. That's not to bad. That's a positive reinforcement but not to strict.
Do you have a boyfriend?

when your 15 your going through a lot of changes.your becoming a womon and should be treated like an adult so i think 15 is too old to be spanked.

No you should not be spanked. It's a crime; child abuse. There is a difference between swatting the bottom of a young child who is to young to understand reason and sexually abusing a teenage girl for the entertainment of male family members and friends. To have a teenage girl pull down her panties even in her bedroom for a bare bottom spanking by her father is a crime but to do it in public is sadistic. Shame on your parents. God will punish them for what they have done to you but they should not escape man's justice either. If you need help email me at mjlaris at g mail dot com.

Mark

God "thinks" this is wrong.......really..... you fell off something there guy.

No, if you believe that God abuses his children that you believe in a different God than I do and are likely a criminal child abuser yourself.

Mark

There\'s a huge difference between child abuse and corporal punishment. It\'s not child abuse if spanking is done to a person over 18. If done for personal pleasure to a person over 18 without consent it is considered sexual assault, but if done with their consent or past acceptance as punishment then that becomes corporal punishment and is accepted by many as acceptable form of discipline. Also to get into the religious topic God does not accept abuse but he does accept disciplinary actions as is shown quite often in the Bible especially in the form of loss (loss of life, slavery, etc.)

It is against the law to hit a dog in all 50 states; it is against the law to hit a prisoner in all 50 states; it is against the law to hit someone in the military in all 50 states. So, we can\'t beat a dog but we can beat a child. This is simply wrong and those who do it are sadists and criminals. As for the bible, it also saysthat you can beat your wife as long at you don\'t use a stick that is longer that the distance from your elbow to the tip of your fingers. Research shows that spanking children causes them to confuse paid and love and leads to serious sexual confustion later in life and sends the message that the might makes right. There are better ways to punish a child.

1 More Response

As for spanking girls I am all for it and it's not really the parent spanking the girl it the girl herself asking for the spanking because she knows the rules of the house and they are if you break any rules you get spank some girls would rather get spanked anyways because at least they are free grounding and other punishments take time and they lose their freedom at least when the are spanked they are free but with a sore bum. As for using implements well that depends on the girl and her bum so girls can take a spanking by hand and it does nothing being there's no pain so their have not learned their lesson and a spanking should hurt right otherwise what the point in spanking them. And as for spanking them on the bare bum why not I think bare bum is like double punishment.I talk to a lot of people here about spanking and one of them told me she more or less understood why her parents which from a hand spanking to using a belt because the hand spanking was working and she was getting more spankings but one the belt was started to be used the spanking sorta slowed down as for the age well that's where I fight with myself because as much as I believe in giving a good spanking at any age. How do you want a 22 year old or whatever age what them to act their age if you treat them like a child then there's the old saying if you act like a child I will treat you like one now get over here and drop your pants. If they are college students and still pay for everything why not.

Well I think people lie about there age because of two things. If they tell their real age they will have to stay in the kids area. And second lying about their age gets into them into other area they can get into and to talk to adults. Sorry this was to answer Yurina and other people who ask why people lie about there age.

I do not think anyone should be spanked unless they like it, do you like it? I think hitting anyone dose not help,only make it worst talking about things is better, like other people have writtin they are other ways

I was spanked up to my 18yrs. Mum obviously thought I needed it, I thought about it differently, of course. Now I think she was just fair to me

i think spank must be exceptionnal never with belt only with hands and speak with child is better than strike sorry

i gave my girls and boys the same bare over the knee more or less depending on what they had done i never spanked in front of others i always did it in there bed room

I'd go with "grounding" and removal of privileges instead. I appreciate that these days, it's hard to completely remove tv / internet / Ipads / Smartphones etc. from a young person's life, but no one ever said maintaining discipline was easy.

Yes, I do think there are times when a girl needs to be spanked when she gets out of line, and I think it should be bare bottom with a hairbrush, paddle, or belt. I think the best place to give the spanking is in her bedroom, with her over the lap for the brush, standing bent over the back of her desk chair for the paddle, or face down over the end of the bed with a pillow under her for the belt. 15 minutes or cornertime is also a good time for her to regain her composure and reflect on what she just got and why. I would also say a typical spanking should be 2 to 3 dozen smacks, given slowly and very deliberately, with more for more serious offenses.

DD relationships can be a beautiful thing, but I think they have to be mutually consensual. Just my 2 cents.

In this case, then they are a great thing.

I could not agree with Kayleeann more. Maybe loss of phone, loss of ipod, being grounded, etc.

Since you are soon to be an adult maybe its time to start experiencing adult consequences. Adults dont get spanked but I only wish that would so much easier. You mess up as an adult you can go to jail, pay a big fine, lose your job, lose your health, lose your partner. So Im saying your punishment should fit the crime. Be creative and sit down with your parents on ways you should be punished. My guess is you will be begging for a spanking. Examples: no internet access for a week, you want sumn you go get a job and buy it yourself, you steal something you work till you can pay it back. You breaf curview you stay home and copy the dictionary on saturday night, etc

Not here in America??? Not in the judicial sense maybe... But in old fashioned super strict homes, churches yes adults (18 - 26ish) are spanked. Then again, I don't consider myself an adult yet, even though the "law" may say I am in every aspect except alcoholic beverages. Groundings work for some, taking things away for some... For others simple spankings.. and for some like me, frequent severe spankings. :)

Yurina, do the spankings work, because I got the sense that you liked them?

I may be wrong, but it was just a feeling I got.

Yes they work, and I like them, I know its hard for some to understand, but there it is. For me its not just a sexual release, its stress release, its stress release for the spankers, its discipline, its psychotherapy, its just what it is. It keeps me sane.

I guess my question is if it stops you from misbehaving.

Being a spanko, I understand the rest of it completely, and many people are just like you. It is a great stress relief for them, and also psychotherapy for them. I'm exactly the same, but only on the spankers side. I don't get to do much of this, but my wife lets me engage in fantasy role play with her to be nice. She is not a spanko like me.

Also I have to wonder why someone claiming to be 15 has her listed age as 18-21.... Hope she doesn't get herself in dangerous situations with predatorial monsters. So guys.. I think mentioning DD and other things needs to not be happening on open forum with a minor, so I apologize for anything offensive posted, and am going to not post replies to her posts now that I fully read up on everything and saw her statement of age and its contrast to her posted age.

Love peace and chicken grease.

Yurina, you have a good point. Also, a lot of people, claiming to be 15 are in reality 50 year old men. I'm 53, and up front about it. I will keep dd off of this group going forward. My apologies.

sounds like u do your best to get a spanking i know you like it

I listed my age status 18-21 because I can't add people myself if I say I am 15..

'Yurina,' in regard to your comment: "am going to not post replies to her posts now that I fully read up on everything and saw her statement of age and its contrast to her posted age."

What could possibly be, your objection to her actual, current age? Might you (perhaps?) believe, that she must (somehow?) necessarily be, "retarded" at this age? -I, most certainly would disagree... Your perspective may be unfortunate, in the sense that you needlessly dismiss what may very well be the reasonable capacities of (underage) others.

I am afraid, this may be an unfortunate and seemingly bigoted perspective that you hold, as you apparently look down upon those of a lesser age than you, as if they might (actually?,) somehow really be "lesser" than you? What kind of a person, are you? ...-Perhaps, a person who just so happens to have, an apparently misguided and maybe even ill-conceived perspective, possibly? Surely, such a matter must necessarily be, quite misfortunate?

6 More Responses